top of page
Aspect and Cinareo Partner to Connect Scenario-Driven Capacity Planning with Real-Time Workforce Execution. Read more
Profile
Join date: May 12, 2023
Posts (6)
Jul 6, 2023 ∙ 2 min
MYTH #6: There’s little value in planning for attrition
Contact centers that fail to plan for attrition will suffer significant financial and workplace consequences. It costs the 100-seat center $25.52 in lost productivity every hour a seat goes unfilled. The worst-case scenario is a center that reacts after attrition occurs. If it takes 74 days to fill an opening with a trained agent, it costs the center $15,108 in lost productivity. Understaffing increases pressure on workers to maintain service levels and negatively affects CXs. Every open seat...
46
0
Jun 8, 2023 ∙ 2 min
MYTH #5: Attrition costs $5,000-$10,000 a person
Attrition is one of the contact center industry’s biggest and most controllable problems. The constant outflow of talent erodes margins,...
44
0
May 31, 2023 ∙ 2 min
MYTH #4: It is impossible to estimate inefficient and lost productivity costs
Contact centers rarely use new-hire learning curve data to estimate lost productivity and create a capacity plan. Learning curve data summarize the time it takes for a new agent to perform proficiently. Mark Alpern estimates that, in the first year of employment, new hires are 67% as efficient as agents with at least one year of tenure. Learning curve results for 1,800 agents from eight centers appear in the chart below. On average, agents are 53% as efficient in the first month of...
88
0
Mark Alpern and Brent Holland
Writer
More actions
bottom of page